Greenwashing Detection
Compares ESG framework claims against actual environmental and social metrics disclosed by SGX-listed companies. A wide gap between narrative (frameworks adopted) and evidence (metrics reported) may indicate greenwashing risk. This analysis is indicative, not definitive.
Companies with ESG Data
3
High Risk
2
Moderate Risk
1
Emissions Disclosed
2
How it Works
Narrative Score (orange bar)
Based on ESG framework adoption claims: TCFD, ISSB, SASB, UN SDGs, Modern Slavery statements. More frameworks = higher narrative score.
Evidence Score (green bar)
Based on actual metrics disclosed: Scope 1/2/3 emissions, gender diversity, safety data, year-on-year improvement, and multi-year consistency.
Gap = Narrative - Evidence. A positive gap suggests claims may outpace substance. Negative gaps indicate under-promoted sustainability efforts.
| Ticker | Company | Risk | Narrative | Evidence | Gap | N vs E |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Z74 | Singapore Telecommunications Ltd | High Risk | 100 | 57 | +43 | |
| D05 | DBS Group Holdings Ltd | High Risk | 50 | 8 | +42 | |
| C6L | Singapore Airlines Ltd | Moderate | 50 | 29 | +21 |
Analysis presented is based on available data and disclosed methodology. Observations may not account for all relevant factors. This content is provided for educational and informational purposes only.